Transmission rates across the PJM Interconnection (PJM) territory have increased dramatically from 2011 to 2017, in some areas by more than 475 percent.
These findings are part of a review released in 2017 by American Municipal Power, Inc. (AMP), which also documents a troubling lack of oversight of supplemental electric transmission projects.
“Investing in transmission infrastructure to ensure a resilient power grid is a legitimate undertaking, and one that AMP and its members support,” said AMP President and CEO Marc Gerken. “But we’re seeing a troubling increase in projects that lack rigorous independent oversight, along with a steep increase in transmission costs for energy customers. Consumers must have the ability to verify that transmission owners are engaging in cost-effective and efficient grid upgrades and expansion that take into account the future needs of a rapidly evolving industry.”
There are two types of transmission projects within PJM, the regional transmission organization that coordinates the electric transmission grid for the portion of the country AMP members are located. “Baseline” transmission projects address reliability concerns, and those baseline projects undergo a thorough open and transparent review and scrutiny by PJM and are ultimately approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
“Supplemental” transmission projects are changes to the transmission system that are not required to satisfy reliability, operational performance or economic criteria. Supplemental transmission projects do not receive the same rigorous review by PJM, even though the costs for these projects are also passed on to consumers. This lack of true oversight means it’s nearly impossible for energy consumers—who ultimately bear the costs of these projects—to verify that they’re getting their money’s worth.
In his review, Ken Rose, a nationally-recognized expert in the structure, regulation and economics of U.S. energy markets, found that transmission projects are on the rise across PJM. From May 2011 through May 2017, the annual revenue requirement (the actual cost for transmission owners to provide transmission service plus a return on their capital investment) for transmission enhancement projects increased by 294.5 percent. He also found that through 2012 there was approximately $21.3 billion of PJM in-service or planned baseline and network upgrades compared to $6.8 billion in supplemental transmission projects. Since 2012, there have been approximately $12.7 billion in supplemental projects compared to $11.6 billion of PJM in-service or planned baseline and network upgrades. This means there were more transmission projects proposed without any true oversight than within the established PJM planning process. With the exception of 2016, the amount of supplemental transmission projects has steadily increased each year.
“There is a shift from baseline projects to supplemental projects as revenue requirements and transmission rates have gone up, a lot – way beyond the levels of inflations.” said Dr. Ken Rose. “Basically, if you continue to have a process where it is fairly easy for the regulated entity to pass project costs through, there is going to be an incentive to continue pursuing supplemental projects.”
AMP’s members have reported similar significant increases in transmission charges over the past eight years. Gerken said that in four of AMP members’ transmission zones, annual revenue requirements have increased by a range of 99 percent to 214 percent over this period.
“Our members are seeing their transmission rates skyrocket,” Gerken said. “We need to able to tell them why this is happening.” Gerken said that there has been little to no opportunity to review and provide written comments before project plans are finalized. “Without appropriate oversight and transparency, consumers have no way to tell if these supplemental transmission projects are prudent.”
See Rose’s review here.
Other links of interest
Brattle Economists: Competitive Transmission Planning Offers Significant Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
Oct. 25, 2018
PJM Stakeholders End Tx Replacement Task Force
July 30, 2018
PJM TOs, Customers Reposition After Supplemental Order
April 2, 2018
Ky. Rejects AEP Supplemental Tx Project
March 22, 2018
Group Contests 'Supplementals' Ruling as PJM, TOs Advance
March 20, 2018
AMP Seeks More PJM Scrutiny of TO Projects
March 13, 2018
PJM, TOs Propose FERC Order 890 Compliance Plan
March 4, 2018
FERC Order regarding new rules for supplemental transmission projects
February 15, 2018
FERC Orders New Rules for Supplemental Tx Projects in PJM
February 15, 2018
PJM TOs, Customers Await Ruling on Supplemental Projects
February 14, 2018
To avoid skyrocketing electric transmission costs, FERC scrutiny of 'supplemental' projects is needed: Marc S. Gerken (Opinion)
December 31, 2017
AMP Presses AEP, PSE&G on Transmission Projects
December 18, 2017
New Wave of PJM Transmission Upgrades Rankles AMP
December 10, 2017
AMP Questions $400M in Added PJM Tx Upgrades
November 6, 2017
AMP calls for more transparency for transmission projects, cites increases in costs
October 4, 2017
Report Decries Rising PJM Tx Costs; Seeks Project Transparency
October 2, 2017
Public Power Takes PJM Gripes to Congress
July 23, 2017
FERC Orders PJM TOs to Change Rules on Supplemental Projects
August 29, 2016